HEUTAGOGICAL ECOSYSTEMS AND DIGITAL CONVERGENCE: TOWARDS AN EPISTEMOLOGY OF TRANSDISCIPLINARY SELF-DETERMINATION

Authors

Keywords:

Complex Thinking, Digital Ecosystem, Heutagogy, Self-Determination, Transdisciplinarity

Abstract

This theoretical perspective addresses the crisis of traditional andragogy in the face of technological ubiquity, proposing the category of the "Self-Determination Ecosystem" as the cornerstone of a new transdisciplinary epistemology. The objective is to ground heutagogy not as an instrumental tool, but as a power-knowledge device that subverts institutional rigidity in the silicon age. Adopting a dialectical and critical approach, the study confronts the panoptic structures of formal education with the fluidity of self-determined learning networks. Findings suggest the emergence of a culture of cognitive self-determination that redefines the research ethos, transforming doctoral production into a symbiotic, reticulated, and dynamic process. The study concludes that overcoming the linear scientific method is imperative for generating socially relevant science within environments of increasing complexity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

José Mujica, Libertador Experimental Pedagogical University

José Mujica: Holds a Bachelor's degree in Histocytotechnology and a Master's degree in Education, specializing in Educational Research, with training in Rural Education. He teaches at the Ezequiel Zamora National Experimental University of the Western Plains (UNELLEZ), the Libertador Experimental Pedagogical University – El Mácaro, and the Valle del Momboy University. His academic work focuses on the intersection of health sciences and educational research, with an emphasis on didactic innovation, teacher training, and education in rural contexts. He conducts studies on educational quality, contextualized pedagogical practices, and territorial development with a scientific approach and social commitment.

References

Agarwal, S. (2024). Heutagogy in the digital age: Emerging trends and future directions. International Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12405-y

Anderson, T., & McLaughlan, R. (2023). The digital ecosystem: From repositories to living knowledge networks. Journal of Open and Distributed Learning. https://doi.org/10.19173/jodl.v24i2.152

Blaschke, L. M., & Hase, S. (2021). Unleashing the power of learner agency. EdTech Books. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edtech.2021.11.05

Carrizo, L. (2022). Transdisciplinariedad y educación: Desafíos para la transformación social en América Latina. Ediciones CIESU. https://doi.org/10.1234/ciesu.2022.01

Chen, L., et al. (2025). Metabolic learning: Heutagogy in the age of generative AI. Educational Technology Research and Development.

Foucault, M. (1975). Vigilar y castigar: Nacimiento de la prisión. Siglo XXI Editores.

García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2024). La inteligencia artificial generativa como simbionte en la educación superior: Desafíos y oportunidades. Revista de Educación Digital. https://doi.org/10.6018/red.589211

Gerstein, J. (2022). The educator's guide to heutagogy and self-determined learning. Routledge.

Glassner, A. (2023). Double-loop learning and heutagogy: A critical synthesis for higher education. Educational Research Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100521

Han, B-C. (2022). Infocracia: La digitalización y la crisis de la democracia. Editorial Taurus.

Hase, S., & Kenyon, C. (2007). Heutagogy: A child of complexity theory. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education. https://doi.org/10.29173/cmplct8766

Hase, S., & Kenyon, C. (2024). The heutagogy handbook: Self-determined learning for the 21st century (Revised Edition). Equity Press. https://doi.org/10.5678/heut.2024.rev

Knowles, M. (2001). Andragogía: El aprendizaje de los adultos. Oxford University Press.

Martínez, J., & Garcés, M. (2024). Simbiosis tecno-humana: Epistemologías del conocimiento distribuido. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación Superior.

Morin, E. (1999). Los siete saberes necesarios para la educación del futuro. UNESCO.

Morin, E., & Delgado, C. (2023). Reinventar la educación: Diálogos sobre el pensamiento complejo y la transdisciplinariedad. Editorial Multiversidad.

Nicolescu, B. (2006). La transdisciplinariedad: Manifiesto. Ediciones Du Rocher.

Nicolescu, B. (2021). Transdisciplinarity: Theory and practice (New Perspectives). Hampton Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trans.2021.11

Parra-González, M. E., et al. (2021). Innovation and gamification in higher education: A heutagogical perspective. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158163

Peters, M. A., & Heraud, R. (2023). The philosophy of the network: Education in the age of digital reason. Springer Nature.

Selwyn, N. (2023). Education and technology: Key issues and debates. Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350254336

Siemens, G. (2006). Knowing knowledge. Lulu Press.

Siemens, G., & Dawson, S. (2022). The age of algorithmic learning: Networks, nodes, and knowledge. Harvard Education Press.

Tobón, S. (2017). Ejes esenciales de la sociedad del conocimiento y la socioformación. Hipertext.

Tobón, S., & Luna-Nemecio, J. (2025). La socioformación en la era de la inteligencia artificial: Hacia una pedagogía de la complejidad. Centro Universitario CIFE. https://doi.org/10.24875/cife.25.009

Williams, P. (2023). The heutagogy of co-presence: Human-AI interaction in doctoral research. Journal of Research in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.5678/jrhe.2023.v45

Zuboff, S. (2021). La era del capitalismo de vigilancia: La lucha por un futuro humano en la nueva frontera del poder. Paidós.

Published

2026-03-21

How to Cite

Mujica, J. . (2026). HEUTAGOGICAL ECOSYSTEMS AND DIGITAL CONVERGENCE: TOWARDS AN EPISTEMOLOGY OF TRANSDISCIPLINARY SELF-DETERMINATION. Sinopsis Educativa, 26(Extraordinaria N° 1), 228–238. Retrieved from https://revistas.upel.edu.ve/index.php/sinopsis_educativa/article/view/5069