ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONS IN UNIVERSITY STUDENTS

Authors

  • Karina Mora Wilches

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56219/trascendere.v3i8.6647

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, cognitive functions, executive functions, university student

Abstract

The emergence of artificial intelligence in the public sphere has had a significant impact on global university education. In this context, this essay seeks to answer the following question: at what point do the artificial intelligences used by our students to support their academic work become tools that promote intellectual inactivity and slow the development of their executive functions? To answer this, a narrative literature review was conducted, focusing on the relevant topic in the Web of Science (WOS). This review included information published between 2022 and 2026 in English and Spanish, taking into account recent empirical evidence. The sole inclusion criterion was the intersection of artificial intelligence and executive functions in university students. Among the main findings is a concerning evidence regarding the use of AI and the deterioration of executive functions. Furthermore, the responses of some states and institutions regarding the regulation and prohibition of AI were analyzed. Finally, the need to promote ethical and targeted use for its optimal benefit is emphasized.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Karina Mora Wilches

Corporación Universitaria Autónoma del Norte, Cúcuta, Colombia

References

Agencia EFE. (2023, 27 de enero). Una famosa universidad francesa prohíbe el uso de ChatGPT o de la IA. SWI swissinfo.ch. https://www.swissinfo.ch/spa/una-famosa-universidad-francesa-prohíbe-el-uso-de-chatgpt-o-de-la-ia/48238112

Agudo, D. P. (2023). El impacto de la revolución de la IA en España y Latinoamérica. Universidad de Barcelona. OBS Business School. https://www.obsbusiness.school/sites/obsbusiness.school/files/media_files/Informe%20OBS%20-%20El%20impacto%20de%20la%20revoluci%C3%B3n%20de%20la%20IA%20en%20Espa%C3%B1a%20y%20Latinoam%C3%A9rica.pdf

Albornoz, J. (1985). Nociones elementales de filosofía. Vadell Hermanos Editores.

Al-Kfairy, M., Mustafa, D. G., Kshetri, N., Insiew, M., & Alfandi, O. (2024). Ethical challenges and solutions of generative AI: An interdisciplinary perspective. Informatics, 11(3), 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics11030058

Alon-Barkat, S., & Busuioc, M. (2021). Human-AI interactions in public sector decision-making: "Automation bias" and "selective adherence" to algorithmic advice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 33(1), 153–169. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muac007

Baquero, R. (1996). Vygotsky y el aprendizaje escolar. Aique.

Briceño, J. (2014). El laberinto de los tres minotauros (1.ª ed.). Biblioteca J. M. Briceño Guerrero. https://sonocreatica.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/El-laberinto-de-los-tres-minotauros-briceno-guerrero.pdf

Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/58.1.7

Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135–168. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750

Ferrater, J. (2002). Diccionario de filosofía. Montecasino. https://www.mercaba.org/Filosofia/FERRATER/Jos%C3%A9%20Ferrater%20Mora%20-%20Diccionario%20Filos%C3%B3fico%20P.pdf

Gabriel, M. (2019). El sentido del pensamiento (G. Imbernón & A. S. Shvartz, Trads.). Pasado & Presente.

Gerlich, M. (2025). AI tools in society: Impacts on cognitive offloading and the future of critical thinking. Societies, 15(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15010006

Grinschgl, S., & Neubauer, A. (2022). Supporting cognition with modern technology: Distributed cognition today and in an AI-enhanced future. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 5, 908261. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2022.908261

Haenlein, M., & Kaplan, A. (2019). A brief history of artificial intelligence: On the past, present, and future of artificial intelligence. California Management Review, 61(4), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619864925

Huang, C., Zhang, Z., Mao, B., & Yao, X. (2023). An overview of artificial intelligence ethics. IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence, 4(4), 799–819. https://doi.org/10.1109/tai.2022.3194503

Jaeger, W. (2009). Paideia: Los ideales de la cultura griega (20.ª reimpresión). Fondo de Cultura Económica. https://detemasytemas.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/32726025-werner-jaeger-paideia-los-ideales-de-la-cultura-griega-iii.pdf

Jose, B., Joseph, D., Mohan, V., Alexander, E., Varghese, S. K., & Roy, A. (2025). Outsourcing cognition: The psychological costs of AI-era convenience. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1645237. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1645237

Korn, J., & Kelly, S. (2023, 9 de enero). Escuelas públicas de Nueva York prohíben el ChatGPT, la inteligencia artificial que podría ayudar a hacer trampa. CNN en Español. https://cnnespanol.cnn.com/2023/01/09/escuelas-publicas-nueva-york-prohiben-chatgpt-inteligencia-artificial-trax

Kuhn, T. S. (1971). La estructura de las revoluciones científicas. Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Lai, S., Chen, M., & Xu, K. (2026). Current status of responsible use of generative AI in senior high school science teaching in China. Frontiers in Education, 11, 1800516. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1800516

Lezak, M. D. (1982). The problem of assessing executive functions. International Journal of Psychology, 17(1–4), 281–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207598208247445

Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (2026). Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on the use of AI in teaching, learning, and research training. MIT.

Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "frontal lobe" tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), 49–100. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0734

Morin, E. (2002). Los siete saberes necesarios para la educación del futuro. UNESCO.

Nicolescu, B. (2002). Manifesto of transdisciplinarity. State University of New York Press.

OECD. (2026). PISA 2025 results (Volume I): Students ready for the future. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/73451bc5-en

Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura. (2020). Consenso de Beijing sobre la inteligencia artificial y la educación. UNESDOC Digital Library. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000374962

Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura. (2022). Recomendación sobre la ética de la inteligencia artificial. UNESDOC Digital Library. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381137

Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000386693

Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura. (2024). Guía para el uso de IA generativa en educación e investigación. UNESDOC Digital Library. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000389227

Pearlman, J. (2023). AI in education: A guide for educators. [Editorial por confirmar].

Quintero, J. (2023). Mente extendida y educación: Implicaciones pedagógicas. [Editorial por confirmar].

Rao, S. (2025). The impact of artificial intelligence tools on human cognitive abilities: A comprehensive review. INNOVAPATH. https://doi.org/10.63501/hsdq5611

Risko, E. F., & Gilbert, S. J. (2016). Cognitive offloading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(9), 676–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.07.002

Schulhoff, S., Ilie, M., Balepur, N., Kahadze, K., Liu, A., Si, C., Li, Y., Gupta, A., Han, H., Schulhoff, S., Dulepet, P. S., Vidyadhara, S., Ki, D., Agrawal, S., Pham, C. M., Kroiz, G. C., Li, F., Tao, H., Srivastava, A., … Resnik, P. (2024). The prompt report: A systematic survey of prompting techniques. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2406.06608

Selwyn, N. (2024). On the limits of artificial intelligence (AI) in education. Nordisk Tidsskrift for Pedagogikk og Kritikk, 10(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.23865/ntpk.v10.6062

Sharma, M., & Singh, S. (2025). The cognitive costs of AI: Burnout and executive functioning in higher education. Mind and Society. https://doi.org/10.56011/mind-mri-143-20259

Sigman, M., & Bilinkis, S. (2023). Artificial. La nueva inteligencia y el contorno de lo humano. Debate.

Zhai, C., Wibowo, S., & Li, L. D. (2024). The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on students' cognitive abilities: A systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 11, 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00316-7

Znidaric, U., Strumbelj, E., & Machidon, O. (2026). A scoping review of the negative effects of digital technology on cognition. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2603.10025

Published

2026-11-04

How to Cite

Karina Mora Wilches. (2026). ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONS IN UNIVERSITY STUDENTS. TRASCENDERE, 3(8). https://doi.org/10.56219/trascendere.v3i8.6647

Issue

Section

Textos para la Difusión