Theoretical configuration of research competencies in virtual university environments in Venezuela

Authors

  • Nathaly Mercado Libertador Experimental Pedagogical University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56219/se.v25i2.4758

Keywords:

research competencies, virtual learning environments, grounded theory, higher education in Venezuela, theoretical construct

Abstract

This article addresses ongoing research, focused on capturing the need to configure a theoretical construct that guides the development of research competencies in Venezuelan university students, using Virtual Learning Environments (VLEs) as a mediating context. The accelerated integration of Information and Communication Technologies into Venezuelan higher education, driven by socioeconomic challenges and the post-pandemic era, has exposed critical deficiencies in infrastructure, connectivity, and digital skills that directly impact research training. This study aims to construct an explanatory framework that emerges from contextualized reality. Methodologically, it is part of the post-positivist paradigm and adopts a qualitative approach, employing the Grounded Theory method of Strauss and Corbin (2002). The key informants are three (03) postgraduate teachers from UPEL-IMPM, Barinas Academic Extension. Data collection is carried out through participant observation and in-depth interviews, analyzing the information through open, axial and selective coding techniques, and constant comparative analysis. The central contribution is a theoretical construct that models and explains essential research competencies (information management, critical thinking, online collaboration) based on the specific dynamics and constraints of the Venezuelan context, offering a basis for the design of institutional policies and pedagogical strategies that transform the quality of higher education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Nathaly Mercado , Libertador Experimental Pedagogical University

Nathaly Mercado, born in Barinas, Venezuela, holds a Bachelor's degree in Accounting (UNELLEZ, 2005), a Master's degree in Educational Innovations (UPEL, 2019), and is currently pursuing a Doctorate in Education (UPEL). She also holds a Diploma in Pedagogical Competencies for Non-Teaching Professionals (UPEL, 2015), has completed the Training Program in Virtual Teaching and Learning Environments - PFEVEA (UNELLEZ, 2017), and is an Expert in Virtual Education (FATLA, 2018). She is a contracted professor (UNELLEZ, UNEFA, Agustín Codazzi Technological Institute, and IMPM UPEL) teaching various subjects and/or curricular units. She is also an administrative staff member at the UPEL IMPM Barinas Academic Extension and participates as a speaker in academic activities.

References

Carrillo, D. (2014). Competencias TIC de los Docentes para la Enseñanza mediante Entornos Virtuales en Educación Superior. El caso de la Universidad de Los Andes-Venezuela: Evaluación y Diseño de un Plan de Formación. Universitat Rovira i Virgili. https://www.tdx.cat/handle/10803/285330#page=7

Garrison, R., Anderson, T., y Archer, W. (2003). A theory of critical inquiry in online distance education. Handbook of distance education, 1(4), 113-127.

Guba, E. G., y Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research. In N. K. Denzin y Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 105-117). Sage.

Laurillard, D. (2013). Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. Routledge.

Martínez M. (1999). La Nueva Ciencia. Su Desafío, Lógica y Método. Editorial Trillas. México, D. F.

Ministerio del Poder Popular para la Educación Universitaria. Comisión Nacional de la UNESCO de la República Bolivariana de Venezuela (2022). Informe sobre la Educación Universitaria. Caracas, Venezuela. https://www.google.com/search?q=https://whec2022.net/resources/Country%2520report%2520-%2520Venezuela%2520ES.pdf

Mogollón de Lugo, I., y Rama, C. (Ed.). (2017). Impacto de las Tecnologías en la Educación Superior a Distancia en Venezuela. Una Década de Retos. SEDUCV, Virtual Educa, OEVALC. http://saber.ucv.ve/handle/10872/20383

Monereo, C., y Pozo, J. I. (2007). Competencias básicas. Cuadernos de pedagogía, 370, 10-18.

Palacios, O. (2021). La teoría fundamentada: origen, supuestos y perspectivas. Intersticios sociales, (22), 47-70. Epub 03 de noviembre de 2021. Recuperado en 21 de octubre de 2025, de http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2007-49642021000200047&lng=es&tlng=es

Rodríguez, L. (2020). Estilos de aprendizaje basados en la teoría de Kolb predominantes en los universitarios. Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala 3(1) 81-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46734/revcientifica.v3i1.22

Rodríguez, M. (2018). Aproximación Epistémica hacia las Competencias Digitales en la Educación Universitaria. Tesis Doctoral. Universidad de Carabobo. Disponible en: https://bit.ly/36iGWFW

Rodríguez, R. (2017). Proceso de actualización de un diseño instruccional para un programa de postgrado bajo la modalidad de educación a distancia. Docencia Universitaria, Volumen XVIII, (1 y 2),124-139.

Rojas, B. (2014). Investigación Cualitativa, fundamentos y Praxis. Fondo Editorial de la Universidad Pedagógica Experimental Libertador FEDEUPEL. Caracas, Venezuela.

Sarell, J. (2024). Competencias digitales del andrólogo en modalidades a distancia: una perspectiva teórica con modelado. Tesis Doctoral. Universidad Central de Venezuela. Disponible en: https://saber.ucv.ve/handle/10872/22820.

Schunk, D. (2012). Teorías del aprendizaje: Una perspectiva educativa. Sexta edición. México. Disponible en: https://moodle.uneg.edu.ve/pluginfile.php/183672/mod_resource/content/1/Teorias-del-Aprendizaje-Dale-Schunk.pdf

Strauss, A. y Corbin, J. (2002). Bases de la Investigación Cualitativa. Técnicas y procedimientos para desarrollar la Teoría Fundamentada. Universidad de Antioquia, Colombia.

Published

2025-12-07

How to Cite

Mercado , N. . (2025). Theoretical configuration of research competencies in virtual university environments in Venezuela. Sinopsis Educativa, 25(2), 294–302. https://doi.org/10.56219/se.v25i2.4758