COGNITIVE BARRIERS IN HANDLING ADDITIVE STRUCTURES: CASE ANALYSIS IN SECOND GRADE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56219/dialctica.v3i29.5748Keywords:
cognitive barriers, primary education, additive structures, numerical thinking, verbal problemsAbstract
This qualitative exploratory-descriptive research analyzed cognitive barriers faced by second-grade students when interpreting verbal statements with additive structures. A multiple case study methodology was employed with 15 students aged 7 to 9 years distributed across three public institutions in Antioquia, Colombia, during the 2016-2017 period. Data collection was conducted through three written instruments based on numerical thinking theory, evaluating dimensions such as numerical sequence, place value, cardinality, and problem-solving. Analysis was based on triangulation of student responses, direct observations, and theoretical contrast, identifying five emerging categories through manual coding. Findings reveal that place value constitutes the most widespread barrier, affecting 93.3% of participants who manipulate symbols without semantic understanding of positional notation. No student reached the bidimensional chain level, contradicting curricular expectations. Dependence on concrete materials was evident with differences exceeding 50 percentage points between problems with and without visual support. Problems with unknowns in initial position showed only 20% successful resolution. Difficulty patterns converged notably among the three institutions regardless of their contextual differences. The need to implement differentiated diagnostics by numerical sequence levels, gradual transition toward abstraction, and prolonged focus on place value that transcends mechanical exercises to construct semantic referents through physical grouping experiences is concluded.
Downloads
References
American Psychological Association (2019). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (7ma ed). https://doi.org/10.1037/0000165-000 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0000165-000
American Psychological Association (2019). Style and Grammar Guidelines. https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammarguidelines/index
Baroody, A. J. (1987). Children's mathematical thinking: A developmental framework for preschool, primary, and special education teachers. Teachers College Press.
Carpenter, T. P., & Moser, J. M. (1984). The acquisition of addition and subtraction concepts in grades one through three. Journal for research in Mathematics Education, 15(3), 179-202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.15.3.0179
Castellanos, J. J. P., Medina, N. A. Z., Redondo, A. L., & Torres, J. P. S. (2022). Caracterización de los resultados del examen Saber Pro en los programas de Fonoaudiología en Colombia en los años 2018–2022. Revista Perspectivas, 7(S1), 363-373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22463/25909215.4022
Castro, E., Rico, L., & Martínez, E. C. (1995). Estructuras aritméticas elementales y su modelización (pp. 45-79). Bogotá: Grupo Editorial Iberoamérica.
Fuson, K. C. (1992). Research on whole number addition and subtraction.
German, R., & Gallistel, C. (1978). The child's understanding of number Cambridge.
Hernández, R., Fernández, C., & Baptista, P. (2014). Metodología de la Investigación (6ta edició; SADCV McGRAW-HILL/INTERAMERICANA EDITORES, Ed.).
Kamii, C. (1999). Young children reinvent arithmetic: Implications of Piaget's theory. Teachers College Press.
Ordoñez Marquinez, L. I. (2014). Estructuras aditivas en la resolución de problemas aditivos de enunciado verbal (PAEV) (Doctoral dissertation).
Piaget, J. (1952). Thechild's conception of number. New York.
Resnick, L. B. (1984). A developmental theory of number understanding.
Stake, R. E. (2020). Investigación con estudio de casos.
Universidad Pedagógica Experimental Libertador (2019). Reglamento de Investigación e Innovación. (gaceta). UPEL, Resolución N° 2019.547.269.
Vergnaud, G. (1991). Langage et pensée dans l'apprentissage des mathématiques. Revue française de pédagogie, 79-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/rfp.1991.1350
Verschaffel, L., De Corte, E., & Pauwels, A. (1992). Solving compare problems: An eye movement test of Lewis and Mayer's consistency hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(1), 85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.1.85
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5). sage.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
La revista Dialéctica conserva los derechos patrimoniales (copyright) de las obras publicadas, que favorece y permite la reutilización de los mismos bajo la licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 , por lo cual se pueden copiar, usar, difundir, transmitir y exponer públicamente, siempre que se cite la autoría y fuente original de su publicación (revista, editorial, URL y DOI de la obra), no se usen para fines comerciales u onerosos y se mencione la existencia y especificaciones de esta licencia de uso. Si remezcla, transforma o crea a partir del material, debe distribuir su contribución bajo la misma licencia del original.









