PHYSICS AND CONSTRUCTIVISM: AN ALLIANCE FOR MEANINGFUL LEARNING

Authors

  • Cristian Enrique Ruiz Silvio

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56219/dialctica.v3i29.5763

Keywords:

Alliance, learning, anchoring, constructivism, teaching

Abstract

ABSTRACT

The fundamental purpose of this essay is to analyze how constructivism represents an ally in the teaching of physics as a science in order to achieve meaningful learning through it, based on the fact that traditional teaching is characterized by leading the student population to take a passive role in which they only receive information and memorize formulas without really understanding the physical phenomena of the universe, which makes this form of teaching ineffective. Therefore, the use of constructivist principles is proposed as a pedagogical support that allows this obsolete teaching pattern to be transformed into an active and truly profound learning practice, through a dynamic process in which students build on their own ideas with guided help from the teacher in their role as facilitator, generating cognitive conflict that makes students reflect and restructure their ideas. Through interaction and collaboration, they contextualize and highlight the relevance of concepts by connecting them with theory. In turn, visualization through experimentation will undoubtedly make learning meaningful, and even more than that, students will feel motivated and empowered by knowledge, thus allowing the development of scientific skills that will lead to logical reasoning and, therefore, critical thinking. It should be noted that constructivism is not only an alternative but a necessity that promotes conceptual understanding in teaching.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Cristian Enrique Ruiz Silvio

Doctorado en Educación

Instituto Pedagógico Rural

“Gervasio Rubio” (IPRGR)

VENEZUELA

References

Ausubel, D. P. (2002). Adquisición y retención del conocimiento. Una perspectiva

Cognitiva.Ed.Paidós.Barcelona.https://issuu.com/luisorbegoso/docs/ausubeladquisicionyretenciond.

Arias F. (2006). El Proyecto de Investigación, Introducción a la metodología científica. EPISTEME – Venezuela.

Bolaño, O. (2020). El constructivismo: modelo pedagógico para la enseñanza de las matemáticas. Revista Educare, 24(3). https://doi.org/10.46498/reduipb.v24i3.1413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46498/reduipb.v24i3.1413

Contreras, F. (2016). El aprendizaje significativo y su relación con otras estrategias. Revista Horizonte de la Ciencia, 6(10). 130 -140. https://doi.org/10.26490/uncp.horizonteciencia.2016.10.210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26490/uncp.horizonteciencia.2016.10.210

Ortiz (2015). El constructivismo como teoría y método de enseñanza. Sophia, Colección de Filosofía de la Educación, 19, 93-110. http://www.redalyc.org/pdf/4418/441846096005.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.17163/soph.n19.2015.04

Serrano, J, y Pons, R. (2011). El Constructivismo hoy: enfoques constructivistas en educación. Revista electrónica de investigación educativa, 13(1), 1-27. http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S160740412011000100001&lng=es&tlng=es.

Ronquillo, G., Litardo, E., Bohórquez, A. y Padilla, J. (2023). Modelo constructivista y su aplicación en el proceso de aprendizaje de los estudiantes. Revista OURNAL OF SCIENCE AND RESEARCH, . https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10420471.

Piaget, J. (1972). Psicología de la Inteligencia. Psique – Argentina. https://piagetflix.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/3-Psicologia-De-La-Inteligencia.pdf.

Piaget, J. (1978). La equilibración de las estructuras cognitivas. Madrid: Siglo XXI.

Published

2026-07-05

How to Cite

Cristian Enrique Ruiz Silvio. (2026). PHYSICS AND CONSTRUCTIVISM: AN ALLIANCE FOR MEANINGFUL LEARNING. DIALÉCTICA, 3(29). https://doi.org/10.56219/dialctica.v3i29.5763