CONVERGENCE OF THE STEAM MODEL AND PEDAGOGICAL RESEARCH TO PROMOTE SCIENTIFIC CURIOSITY THROUGH A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE

Authors

  • Angélica María Loaiza Ortiz
  • Luis Alberto Avellaneda Caceres
  • Alix Cristina Rivera Medina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56219/dialctica.v3i30.6127

Keywords:

scientific literacy, scientific curiosity, primary education, pedagogical research, STEAM model

Abstract

Scientific curiosity in primary education is the fundamental driver of critical thinking development; however, traditional teaching practices often fragment knowledge, restricting students' innate curiosity. The objective of this literature review article was to analyze the convergence between research as a pedagogical strategy and the STEAM approach as a theoretical model for enhancing such curiosity. Methodologically, a descriptive documentary research study was conducted, based on the search, selection, and critical analysis of 17 primary academic sources, most of which were published between 2021 and 2025. The collection process was carried out in indexed databases, prioritizing high-impact articles that allowed for rigorous triangulation. The review showed that the STEAM model transcends the grouping of disciplines, configuring itself as a transdisciplinary ecosystem where the artistic component acts as a bridge to scientific awareness. It was identified that the integration of research in the classroom under this approach stimulates higher cognitive processes by placing students in front of real problems. In conclusion, it is argued that fostering scientific curiosity through the articulation of research and STEAM is imperative to overcome encyclopedic teaching. This combination allows for a transition from reproductive education to training focused on scientific literacy and critical citizenship from an early age. The review highlights a gap in contextualized teaching guides for the Latin American environment, suggesting the need for future lines of research that effectively operationalize these theoretical frameworks in contemporary primary school teaching practice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Angélica María Loaiza Ortiz

Institución Educativa

Domingo Irurita

Palmira, Valle del Cauca

Colombia

Luis Alberto Avellaneda Caceres

Institución Educativa

Simón Bolívar

Cúcuta, Norte de Santander

Colombia

Alix Cristina Rivera Medina

Institución Educativa

Simón Bolívar

Cúcuta, Norte de Santander

Colombia

References

Aguilera, D. y Ortiz-Revilla, J. (2021). Educación STEM vs. STEAM y creatividad estudiantil: una revisión sistemática de la literatura. Ciencias de la Educación, 11 (7), 331. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070331

Baruch, Y. K., Mevarech, Z., y Spektor-Levy, O. (2025). Preschoolers’ scientific curiosity and inquiry capabilities: An ecological research approach. Revista de Investigación en la Enseñanza de las Ciencias 63, 1 (40-61) https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.70019

Correa-Delgado, J. S. (2024). La investigación como estrategia pedagógica: una alternativa latinoamericana a la educación STEAM. Prospectiva. Revista de Trabajo Social e Intervención Social, (37), e21213065. https://doi.org/10.25100/prts.v0i37.13065

Engel, S. (2015). The Hungry Mind: The Origins of Curiosity in Childhood. Harvard University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvjsf3x7

Furman, M. (2021). Enseñar las ciencias naturales en la educación primaria. Paidós. https://www.planetadelibros.com.ar/libro-ensenar-distinto/336496

Harlen, W. (2022). Grandes ideas de la ciencia: Educación para la ciudadanía científica. Ediciones Universidad de Chile. https://libros.uchile.cl/1234

Jirout, J. J. (2020). Supporting Early Scientific Thinking Through Curiosity. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1717 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01717

Kelley, T. R., y Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/ 10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z

Luce, M. R., y Hsi, S. (2015). Science-Relevant Curiosity Expression and Interest in Science: An Exploratory Study. Science Education, 99(1), 70-97. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21144

Margot, K. C., y Knippels, M. C. (2021). Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: a systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 6 (1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0151-z

Martínez-Borreguero, G., et al. (2023). Análisis de las dimensiones del enfoque STEAM en la formación inicial de maestros. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ ensen_divulg_cienc. 2023.v20.i1.1202

Mejía-Cáceres, M. A., y Freire, L. M. (2021). Influences of Educational Policy on the Pre-Service Education of Teachers in Science and Environmental Education: A Latin American Context. Studia Paedagogica, 26 (2), 139-163. https://doi.org/10.5817/SP2021-2-7

Mejía Jiménez, M. R., y Manjarrés, M. E. (2011). La investigación como estrategia pedagógica: una apuesta por construir pedagogías críticas en el siglo XXI. Praxis & Saber, 2 (4), 127 - 177. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=477248388007

OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Results (Volume I): The State of Learning and Equity in Education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23832-en

Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., De Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., y Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S. y Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372 (n71). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Perignat, Y., y Katz-Buonincontro, J. (2021). STEAM in Practice and Research: An Integrative Review of the Literature. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 100527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.10.002

Pineda, D. Y. (2023). Enfoque STEAM: Retos y oportunidades para los docentes. Revista Internacional de Pedagogía e Innovación Educativa, 3 (1), 229-244. https://doi.org/10.51660/ripie.v3i1.115

Quigley, C. F., y Herro, D. (2019). Guía para educadores sobre STEAM: Cómo involucrar a los estudiantes usando problemas del mundo real https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2019.1665868

Red de Habilidades en Lectura Crítica Español (CASPe). (2021). Plantillas para la lectura crítica: Revisiones Sistemáticas. https://redcaspe.org/materiales/

UNESCO. (2022). Reimaginar juntos nuestros futuros: un nuevo contrato social para la educación. Ediciones UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/ pf0000381560

Vásquez, J. A., Sneider, C., y Comer, M. (2013). STEM Lesson Essentials, Grades 3-8: Integrating Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Heinemann. https://www.heinemann.com/products/e04358.aspx

Yakman, G. (2008). STEAM Education: an overview of creating a model of integrative education. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327351326

Published

2026-08-24

How to Cite

Angélica María Loaiza Ortiz, Luis Alberto Avellaneda Caceres, & Alix Cristina Rivera Medina. (2026). CONVERGENCE OF THE STEAM MODEL AND PEDAGOGICAL RESEARCH TO PROMOTE SCIENTIFIC CURIOSITY THROUGH A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE. DIALÉCTICA, 3(30). https://doi.org/10.56219/dialctica.v3i30.6127

Issue

Section

Revisión Bibliográfica