FAMILY UPBRINGING AND SCHOOL COEXISTENCE: AN INDISSOLUBLE LINK FOR COMPREHENSIVE STUDENT DEVELOPMENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56219/lneaimaginaria.v23i2.5109Keywords:
Family upbringing, School coexistence, Holistic development, Educational contextAbstract
School coexistence has emerged as a central axis for understanding the tensions and opportunities present in educational institutions located in socially vulnerable contexts. In this scenario, the family is recognized as the original space where the student builds identity and relationships, transferring to school life the bonds, values, and behavioral models learned at home. This essay, framed within a qualitative–interpretative approach and grounded in the theoretical contributions of Bronfenbrenner, Bandura, Rutter, Weiner, and Vygotsky, examines the interaction between family socialization and school coexistence as a dynamic, contextual, and decisive process for comprehensive student development. It argues that the school, far from being a neutral environment, acts as a translator and re-interpreter of family legacies, a role that becomes even more significant in urban settings marked by marginalization. Consequently, school coexistence should not be reduced to the regulation of sanctionable behaviors but must be integrated into the curriculum and teaching practice as a formative core. The analysis concludes that a strong alliance between family and school based on shared responsibility, open dialogue, and mutual empathy is essential to educate individuals capable of managing conflicts constructively, strengthening respectful relationships, and actively participating in community life. This reflection aims to contribute to the design of school policies, the planning of pedagogical practices, and the implementation of psychoeducational support strategies that, in complex contexts, guide collective efforts toward relational justice and mutual recognition.
Downloads
References
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1994). Ecological models of human development. En T. Husén & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education* (Vol. 3, 2ª ed., pp. 37–43). Pergamon Press.
Cole, M., & Scribner, S. (2013). The Psychology of Literacy. Harvard University Press.
Epstein, J. L. (2018). School, family, and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools (2ª ed.). Routledge.
Fernández, J., & Ortega, M. (2020). Percepciones atribucionales en la relación docente–familia. Psicología Escolar e Educacional, 24, e221818. https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-3539/2020/018818
Fullan, M. (2016). The new meaning of educational change (5ª ed.). Teachers College Press.
González, P., & Ruiz, S. (2021). Cambios estructurales familiares y su impacto en la vida escolar: Un estudio longitudinal. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 79 (280), 435–https://doi.org/10.22550/REP79-3-2021-05
Grotberg, E. H. (2003). La resiliencia en el mundo de hoy: Cómo superar las adversidades. Gedisa.
Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. Teachers College Press.
Herrera, L., & Paredes, C. (2018). Influencia de la coherencia familia–escuela en el comportamiento prosocial estudiantil. Revista Interamericana de Psicología, 52 (2), 178. https://doi.org/10.30849/ripijp.v52i2.736
Jennings, P. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (2009). The prosocial classroom: Teacher social and emotional competence in relation to student and classroom outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 79 (1), 491–525. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325693
López, C., & Cárdenas, A. (2020). Modelos familiares y resolución de conflictos en contextos escolares. Revista Colombiana de Educación, 79, 70–89. https://doi.org/10.17227/rce.num79-10075
López, M. (2020). Estrategias de colaboración familia–escuela para la convivencia. Revista de Innovación Educativa, 12 (1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.21071/rie.v12i1.11805
Martínez, P. (2021). Familia y escuela: Una alianza para la ciudadanía. Educatio Siglo XXI, 39 (1), 31–50. https://doi.org/10.6018/educatio.412571
Meza Rueda, J. L., & Páez Martínez, R. M. (2016). Familia, escuela y desarrollo humano. Rutas de investigación educativa. Universidad de La Salle. https://biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar/Colombia/fce-unisalle/20170117012114/familiaescuela.pdf
Pajares, F. (2002). Overview of social cognitive theory and of self-efficacy. Emory University. https://www.uky.edu/~eushe2/Pajares/eff.html
Pérez, L., & Rodríguez, F. (2019). Microsistemas en interacción: Familia y escuela en el desarrollo socioemocional. Psicoperspectivas, 18 (2), 54–68. https://doi.org/10.5027/psicoperspectivas-vol18-issue2-fulltext-1602
Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford University Press.
Rutter, M. (2012). Resilience as a dynamic concept. Development and Psychopathology, 24 (2), 335–344. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579412000028
Tudge, J., Mokrova, I., Hatfield, B., & Karnik, R. (2009). Uses and misuses of Bronfenbrenner’s bioecological theory of human development. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 1 (4), 198–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2589.2009.00026.x
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92 (4), 548–573. https://acmd615.pbworks.com/f/weinerAnattributionaltheory.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
La revista Línea Imaginaria conserva los derechos patrimoniales (copyright) de las obras publicadas, que favorece y permite la reutilización de los mismos bajo la licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 , por lo cual se pueden copiar, usar, difundir, transmitir y exponer públicamente, siempre que se cite la autoría y fuente original de su publicación (revista, editorial, URL y DOI de la obra), no se usen para fines comerciales u onerosos y se mencione la existencia y especificaciones de esta licencia de uso. Si remezcla, transforma o crea a partir del material, debe distribuir su contribución bajo la misma licencia del original.










