FAMILY UPBRINGING AND SCHOOL COEXISTENCE: AN INDISSOLUBLE LINK FOR COMPREHENSIVE STUDENT DEVELOPMENT

Authors

  • Camilo Ruiz Dia
  • Ingrid Mosquera Jacinto
  • Víctor Jáuregui Becerra

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56219/lneaimaginaria.v23i2.5109

Keywords:

Family upbringing, School coexistence, Holistic development, Educational context

Abstract

School coexistence has emerged as a central axis for understanding the tensions and opportunities present in educational institutions located in socially vulnerable contexts. In this scenario, the family is recognized as the original space where the student builds identity and relationships, transferring to school life the bonds, values, and behavioral models learned at home. This essay, framed within a qualitative–interpretative approach and grounded in the theoretical contributions of Bronfenbrenner, Bandura, Rutter, Weiner, and Vygotsky, examines the interaction between family socialization and school coexistence as a dynamic, contextual, and decisive process for comprehensive student development. It argues that the school, far from being a neutral environment, acts as a translator and re-interpreter of family legacies, a role that becomes even more significant in urban settings marked by marginalization. Consequently, school coexistence should not be reduced to the regulation of sanctionable behaviors but must be integrated into the curriculum and teaching practice as a formative core. The analysis concludes that a strong alliance between family and school based on shared responsibility, open dialogue, and mutual empathy is essential to educate individuals capable of managing conflicts constructively, strengthening respectful relationships, and actively participating in community life. This reflection aims to contribute to the design of school policies, the planning of pedagogical practices, and the implementation of psychoeducational support strategies that, in complex contexts, guide collective efforts toward relational justice and mutual recognition.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Camilo Ruiz Dia

SED Bogotá

Colombia

Ingrid Mosquera Jacinto

SED Bogotá

Colombia

Víctor Jáuregui Becerra

SE Norte de Santander

Colombia

References

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1994). Ecological models of human development. En T. Husén & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education* (Vol. 3, 2ª ed., pp. 37–43). Pergamon Press.

Cole, M., & Scribner, S. (2013). The Psychology of Literacy. Harvard University Press.

Epstein, J. L. (2018). School, family, and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools (2ª ed.). Routledge.

Fernández, J., & Ortega, M. (2020). Percepciones atribucionales en la relación docente–familia. Psicología Escolar e Educacional, 24, e221818. https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-3539/2020/018818

Fullan, M. (2016). The new meaning of educational change (5ª ed.). Teachers College Press.

González, P., & Ruiz, S. (2021). Cambios estructurales familiares y su impacto en la vida escolar: Un estudio longitudinal. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 79 (280), 435–https://doi.org/10.22550/REP79-3-2021-05

Grotberg, E. H. (2003). La resiliencia en el mundo de hoy: Cómo superar las adversidades. Gedisa.

Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. Teachers College Press.

Herrera, L., & Paredes, C. (2018). Influencia de la coherencia familia–escuela en el comportamiento prosocial estudiantil. Revista Interamericana de Psicología, 52 (2), 178. https://doi.org/10.30849/ripijp.v52i2.736

Jennings, P. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (2009). The prosocial classroom: Teacher social and emotional competence in relation to student and classroom outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 79 (1), 491–525. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325693

López, C., & Cárdenas, A. (2020). Modelos familiares y resolución de conflictos en contextos escolares. Revista Colombiana de Educación, 79, 70–89. https://doi.org/10.17227/rce.num79-10075

López, M. (2020). Estrategias de colaboración familia–escuela para la convivencia. Revista de Innovación Educativa, 12 (1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.21071/rie.v12i1.11805

Martínez, P. (2021). Familia y escuela: Una alianza para la ciudadanía. Educatio Siglo XXI, 39 (1), 31–50. https://doi.org/10.6018/educatio.412571

Meza Rueda, J. L., & Páez Martínez, R. M. (2016). Familia, escuela y desarrollo humano. Rutas de investigación educativa. Universidad de La Salle. https://biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar/Colombia/fce-unisalle/20170117012114/familiaescuela.pdf

Pajares, F. (2002). Overview of social cognitive theory and of self-efficacy. Emory University. https://www.uky.edu/~eushe2/Pajares/eff.html

Pérez, L., & Rodríguez, F. (2019). Microsistemas en interacción: Familia y escuela en el desarrollo socioemocional. Psicoperspectivas, 18 (2), 54–68. https://doi.org/10.5027/psicoperspectivas-vol18-issue2-fulltext-1602

Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford University Press.

Rutter, M. (2012). Resilience as a dynamic concept. Development and Psychopathology, 24 (2), 335–344. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579412000028

Tudge, J., Mokrova, I., Hatfield, B., & Karnik, R. (2009). Uses and misuses of Bronfenbrenner’s bioecological theory of human development. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 1 (4), 198–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2589.2009.00026.x

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92 (4), 548–573. https://acmd615.pbworks.com/f/weinerAnattributionaltheory.pdf

Published

2026-03-23

How to Cite

Camilo Ruiz Dia, Ingrid Mosquera Jacinto, & Víctor Jáuregui Becerra. (2026). FAMILY UPBRINGING AND SCHOOL COEXISTENCE: AN INDISSOLUBLE LINK FOR COMPREHENSIVE STUDENT DEVELOPMENT. LÍNEA IMAGINARIA, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.56219/lneaimaginaria.v23i2.5109