POSTCONSTRUCTIVISM AND GEEMPA METHODOLOGY: INNOVATIONS IN EDUCATIONAL PRAXIS FOR THE 21ST CENTURY

Authors

  • María Elena Campo Albornoz
  • Hermer Guimar Loza Rengifo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56219/lneaimaginaria.v1i20.3716

Keywords:

Postconstructivism, GEEMPA, praxis, innovation, pedagogy

Abstract

This essay seeks to explore the field of postconstructivist theory and the GEEMPA methodology (Study Group on Education, Research Methodology and Action), a method originally developed in Brazil, in the contemporary educational context. Post-constructivism is a theory that emerges after constructivism, to give life to instances of learning that were not contemplated in it, thus offering a theoretical framework that questions absolute truths and manages to promote a more dynamic and pluralistic sense of education in the educational process. For its part, the GEEMPA methodology, created with the purpose of improving the teaching of reading and writing, allows the innovation of educational practices, clearly reflecting the principles of postconstructivism, where learning occurs in a full interaction that involves not only the three poles: the learner, reality and others, but also the figure of the “Other,” a concept that arises from the internalization of others, aspects that allow us to sustain and argue that the integration of this methodology in educational praxis offers effective responses to the challenges of the 21st century, also promoting, a more inclusive learning, fostering otherness and organizing provocations so that students are able to generate their own hypotheses in the learning process. The essay provides insight into both the theoretical foundations and practical applications of the GEEMPA methodology, to innovate the daily educational practice and allow for a true education where “all students can learn”.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

María Elena Campo Albornoz

Doctorando en Educación UPEL - IPRGR

Hermer Guimar Loza Rengifo

Doctorando en Educación UPEL - IPRGR

References

Baquero, R. (2012). Vigotsky y el aprendizaje escolar (5ª ed.). Aique Grupo Editor. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1owwwBAgKTQAAzCBABbH0OPaSiR37tSJx/view

Castorina, J. A. (2014). Desarrollo del conocimiento social: Prácticas, discursos y teoría. Miño y Dávila Editores. https://books.google.com.co/books/about/ DESARROLLO_DEL_CONOCIMIENTO_SOCIAL.html?id=vsfXSAAACAAJ&redir_esc=y

Coll, C., Palacios, J., y Marchesi, A. (2019). Desarrollo psicológico y educación: Respuestas educativas a las dificultades de aprendizaje (3ª ed.). Alianza Editorial. https://archive.org/details/collc.-palaciosj.-marchesia.-desarrollo-psicologico-y-educacion.-2.-psicologia-d

De Zubiría Samper, J. (2015). Los modelos pedagógicos: Hacia una pedagogía dialogante (4ª ed.). Magisterio Editorial. https://bibliotecadigital.magisterio.co/ libro/los-modelos-pedag-gicos-hacia-una-pedagog-dialogante

Dussel, I., y Caruso, M. (2015). La invención del aula: Una genealogía de las formas de enseñar. Santillana. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B01w2UytKKSrR 3hJd0JmTFJlWlk/view?resourcekey=0-tyzksXqHeRK1SNurgvZE6Q

Ferreiro, E. (2016). Alfabetización: Teoría y práctica. Siglo XXI Editores. https://archive.org/details/ferreiro-e.-alfabetizacion-teoria-y-practica

Kamii, C., y DeVries, R. (2013). La teoría de Piaget y la educación preescolar (4ª ed.). Visor. https://books.google.com.co/books/about/La_teor%C3%ADa_de _Piaget_y_la_educaci%C3%B3n_pre.html?id=FVgtAAAACAAJ&redir_esc=y

Meirieu, P. (2016). Aprender, sí. Pero ¿cómo? (9ª ed.). Octaedro. https://archive.org/details/meirieu-ph.-aprender-si-pero-co-mo

Pain, S. (2012). Diagnóstico y tratamiento de los problemas de aprendizaje. Nueva Visión. https://miel.unlam.edu.ar/data/contenido/3363/6---Sara-Pain-Diagnostico-y-tratamiento-de-los-problemas-de-aprendizaje.pdf

Palacios, A. N., Morillo, J. P., & González, A. I. (2019). Educación en y para la democracia. https://www.redalyc.org/journal/279/27961483005/html/

Perrenoud, P. (2012). Cuando la escuela pretende preparar para la vida: ¿Desarrollar competencias o enseñar otros saberes? Graó. https://www.redage.org/publicaciones/cuando-la-escuela-pretende-preparar-para-la-vida-desarrollar-competencias-o-ensenar

Salmerón Pérez, H., & Gutierrez-Braojos, C. (2012). LA COMPETENCIA DE APRENDER A APRENDER Y EL APRENDIZAJE AUTORREGULADO.POSICIONAMIENTOS TEÓRICOS. EDITORIAL. Profesorado. Revista de Currículum y Formación de Profesorado, 16(1), 5-13. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/567/56724377001.pdf

Teberosky, A., y Soler, M. (2020). Contextos de alfabetización inicial (2ª ed.). Horsori Editorial. https://books.google.com.co/books/about/Contextos_de_alfabetizaci %C3%B3n_inicial.html?id=e4YEMQAACAAJ&redir_esc=y

Vergnaud, G. (2009). The Theory of Conceptual Fields. Human Development, 52(2), 83-94. https://www.each.usp.br/cmapping/iiciclo/artigo-marco.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000202727

Wallon, H. (2007). La evolución psicológica del niño. Crítica. https://es.scribd.com/document/212479494/WALLON-La-evolucion-psicologica-del-nino

Published

2025-04-23

How to Cite

María Elena Campo Albornoz, & Hermer Guimar Loza Rengifo. (2025). POSTCONSTRUCTIVISM AND GEEMPA METHODOLOGY: INNOVATIONS IN EDUCATIONAL PRAXIS FOR THE 21ST CENTURY. LÍNEA IMAGINARIA, 1(20). https://doi.org/10.56219/lneaimaginaria.v1i20.3716

Issue

Section

Reporte de Investigación